![]() The subject of current charts was thoroughly covered in an article in the FAA's July/August 1997 issue of FAA Aviation News. The FAA has rendered interpretations that have stated the foregoing.Title 14 CFR section 121.549 (Air Carrier-Big Airplanes).Title 14 CFR section 135.83 (Air Carriers-Little Airplane).Title 14 CFR section 91.503 (Large and Turbojet powered aircraft).The only FAA/FAR requirements that pertain to charts are:.An expired chart will not show new frequencies or newly constructed obstructions, some of which could be tall enough to be a hazard along your route of flight. You should always carry a current chart for safety's sake. What is not specifically addressed in the regulation is a requirement for charts. The specific FAA regulation, FAR 91.103 "Preflight Actions," states that each pilot in command shall, before beginning a flight, become familiar with all available information concerning that flight. The term "charts" is not found in the FAA's Part 91 regulations (other than for large and turbine-powered multiengine airplanes in 91.503). What is the FAA policy for carrying current charts? "Everything Explained" is not immune from a desire to simplify and "you always have to have them" is much "simpler" than "it's a good idea because even though there's no reg requiring it, other regs may come into play if there is a problem." Unfortunately, "simpler" often means at least partly wrong.įunny but if you got to the FAA/NACO website. Even an assumption that further FAA tapes would show that respondent made multiple attempts to reach ATC would not lessen the seriousness of his actions. Taking off without necessary familiarization and without proper charts into an obviously congested airspace such as the Boston area, and continuing the flight after failing to obtain a clearance obviously justified a finding of carelessness, at a minimum. We agree with the law judge that this was egregious conduct for any pilot. From the NTSB opinion upholding a 90-day suspension: ![]() The pilot tried to argue that he knew he was near the Class B and repeatedly tried to contact ATC, so the FAA should go easy on him. "Everything Explained" is referring to a 1996 NTSB case where a VFR pilot took off from Norwood MA without VFR charts and busted the Boston Class B airspace. There is a Part 91 FAR that requires Large and Turbine Powered Multiengine Airplanes and Fractional aircraft to carry them (see 91.503).īut, if there is any kind of problem involving an airspace violation or information that appears on a chart, you can bet that the FAA will claim a violation of 91.103 (all pertinent information) or 91.13 (reckless operation). Click to expand.There's no specific FAR that requires a basic Part 91 flight to carry current charts, VFR or IFR.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |